GAFFNEY: Stealth jihad in the Senate

 Durbin seeks to silence religious freedom commission

 By Frank J. Gaffney Jr.- The Washington Times
December 12, 2011

We have been hearing a lot about the Muslim Brotherhood lately - and none of it is good news. Get used to it. With the Brotherhood’s ascendancy in the Middle East, North Africa, Turkey and beyond, the world is going to be subjected to a crash course in Islamist supremacism - and what it means for the rest of us.

We were on notice even before the Egyptian elections in which the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and their allies secured upward of 60 percent of the votes in that country’s new, post-Mubarak parliament - and the murderous violence toward Coptic Christians that preceded them. A reminder came on Dec. 7 when a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit unanimously affirmed convictions of leaders of the MB-associated Holy Land Foundation. The earlier trial in 2008 did much to expose the totalitarian, supremacist nature and seditious objectives of that group, elsewhere and here in the United States.

Notably, evidence introduced (uncontested by the defense) in that case by federal prosecutors established that the Brotherhood has established myriad front organizations, including the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the North American IslamicTrust (NAIT), to pursue what it calls “civilization jihad.” This is a stealthy form of holy war, designed to “eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within … by their hands [i.e., those of the infidels].”

The Obama administration has greatly facilitated the efforts of such organizations to penetrate and influence the government of the United States. To cite but one example, on Monday, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton convened a meeting with representatives of the Brotherhood’s multinational official counterpart, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). As Phyllis Chesler points out in a brilliant essay published by PJMedia titled “The End of Religious Freedom,” the OIC’s stated purpose for this meeting was to counter “media campaigns and fabrications made by some quarters in nonmember states regarding the mistreatment of non-Muslim minorities and communities in the OIC member states under the slogans of religious freedoms and so on.”

Put simply, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and other adherents to the Islamist politico-military-legal doctrine of Shariah seek to impose their practice of “blasphemy” laws worldwide. Accordingly, they seek to suppress information that “offends Muslims” or otherwise puts them, their agenda or their behavior in a negative light - no matter how accurately.

More...

Allen West: "Ever since Muhammad left Mecca and took his Hijrah to Medina there was a violent turn to this faith that is called Islam...."

... And we must confront that and we must understand that."

Exactly. That is the truth that must not be spoken (except we do anyway): Muslims who undertake violent jihad to advance the cause of Islam do so following the example of its founder. On so many issues, from jihadist warfare to antisemitism to child marriage, the heart of the resistance to reform is the example of Muhammad himself.

Denial is not reform.

Read The Rest

The “Grand Jihad” Planned for America

via Discover The Networks

In a secret document, the Muslim Brotherhood candidly spells out its goal of “destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house.”

In July 2007, seven key leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that they had: (a) provided "material support and resources" to a foreign terrorist organization (namely Hamas); (b) engaged in money laundering; and (c) breached the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which prohibits transactions that threaten American national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the U.S. government released a list of approximately 300 "unindicted co-conspirators" and "joint venturers." During the course of the HLF trial, many incriminating documents were entered into evidence. Perhaps the most significant of these was "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America," by the Muslim Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram.

THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD'S "GENERAL STRATEGIC GOAL" FOR NORTH AMERICA

See also

close

• Conflating Judaism and Left-wing Politics
• A Call to Spare Every Killer’s Life
• Where Radicals Are Made
• The Socialist Party That Helped Launch Obama’s Career
• Reshaping America’s Courts, Soros-Style
• Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)
• ISNA Fiqh Committee (now known as the Fiqh Council of North America)
• ISNA Political Awareness Committee
• Muslim Youth of North America
• Muslim Students Association of the U.S. and Canada
• Association of Muslim Scientists and Engineers
• Islamic Medical Association (of North America)
• Islamic Teaching Center
• Malaysian Islamic Study Group
• Foundation for International Development
• North American Islamic Trust
• Islamic Centers Division
• American Trust Publications
• Audio-Visual Center
• Islamic Book Service
• Islamic Circle of North America
• Muslim Arab Youth Association
• Islamic Association for Palestine
• United Association for Studies and Research
• International Institute of Islamic Thought
• Muslim Communities Association
• Association of Muslim Social Scientists (of North America)
• Islamic Housing Cooperative
• Muslim Businessmen Association
• Islamic Education Department
• Occupied Land Fund (later known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development)
• Mercy International Association
• Baitul Mal Inc.
• Islamic Information Center (of America)

Youtube - The real Islam revealed

Play

Close

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=k9qRw...

Newspoint: The Issues with Islam and the Ground Zero Mosque

That Rauf, and now his wife, have both been sent abroad on U.S Taxpayers' money, when they say they believe American's "Hate" Muslims, is creepily like a similar failure:

The 7/7 bombings in London, in which Islamists killed 52 and injured 700, prompted British authorities to work with Muslims to avoid future violence.

However, rather than turn to anti-Islamist Muslims who reject the triumphalist goal of applying Islamic law in Europe, they promoted non-violent Islamists, hoping these would persuade coreligionists to express their hatred of the West in lawful ways. This effort featured Tariq Ramadan (b. 1962), a prominent Islamist intellectual. For example, London's Metropolitan Police partially funded a conference Ramadan addressed and Prime Minister Tony Blair appointed him to an official "working group on tackling extremism."

Deploying an Islamist may have seemed like a original and clever idea but it was neither. Western governments have been allying without success with Islamists for decades. Indeed, they have been allying with Ramadan's own family.[1]

The Issues with Islam and the Ground Zero Mosque

August 27, 2010 by Dave Virkler 

A strange multi-focus – religiously, historically and politically – is centered on a damaged building near Ground Zero in lower Manhattan. A professedly moderate Muslim imam, Faisel Rauf, who interestingly has been sent to foreign nations as an official U.S. government spokesman for better Islamic relations, wants to build a 13-story mosque two blocks from the site of the 9/11 attacks.

Critics point out that Muslims, whatever their brand, were the sole perpetrators of the disaster, and the Muslim mosque, legally permissible as it might be, merely refreshes painful memories and opens old wounds.

The imam’s wife, Daisy Khan, worsened the strife last Sunday by saying, “We are deeply concerned, because this is like a metastasized anti-Semitism.” She added, “It’s beyond Islamophobia. It’s hate of Muslims.”

It has been wisely observed that hatred of Muslim never materialized after the 9/11 attacks. Islam generally was not blamed nor were mosques set upon. But the proposed multi-story building by the Cordoba Initiative is just too similar to historic mosque-building associated with Islamic takeovers of captured churches and synagogues.

The name refers to Cordoba, Spain, which 1,000 years ago, was a great city that was dominated both politically and religiously by Islam. The imam says the name reflects the peaceful co-existence between Muslims and other faiths, but Cordoba was conquered through jihad, and the mosque there was originally a church.

Read The Rest

« Daniel Pipes National Review Online. May 25, 2010 How Islamists Came to Dominate European Islam